Skip to main content

Climate Change At The Micro Level: Utah

The Salt Lake Tribune has a piece up today about climate change, Utah air quality, and the economics of the health fallout of increasingly bad air in the Valley. Quoth the Trib:

This week’s heat and red-air warnings* raise a question: What will Utah’s summer pollution problem be like if, as scientists suggest, climate change means more hot, stuffy days like Wednesday?

The Union of Concerned Scientists answered the question in a recent report that says Utahns, like other Americans grappling with ozone pollution, can expect breathing problems to rise because of the pollution-climate link, as well as the health care costs of treating the added illnesses.

Up to 46,852 more cases of asthma and other respiratory illnesses can be expected by 2020, and costs could rise by as much as $107 million a year to treat those illnesses, the group said in its report, “Climate Change and Your Health: Rising Temperatures, Worsening Ozone Pollution.”




You can find the full report here. All this reminds me of a day I remember when Salt Lake's air quality, due to the usual combination of factors including inversion and dust, was the very worst in the United States of America.

State Street south of 3900 South is still one vast, godforsaken shining labyrinth of auto dealerships, and despite the best efforts (and they are very good efforts) of the Utah Transit Authority to expand TRAX service, use, &c. Salt Lake's population still explodes during the day and most of the worker bees tool in from the exurbs in their trucks and SUVs and then again in the evening they chug home.

The astonishing statistics that make Salt Lake City the 3rd most "commuter populated" city in the US were first brought to the attention of Utahns by the Deseret News , and many of us actual Salt City residents have been understandably a little pissed off at exurban commuter culture since then.

In other words, things could trend even worse than the UCS' predictions, depending on how impervious to reality the habits of Utahns are.

It might be time to stock up on the basics of air filtration - thankfully for us denizens of Eaarth, there are a few cheap precautions/fixes available.

* - For you non-Utahns, we have an air quality scale here that varies day by day. A quick and dirty (no pun intended) summary from Breathe Utah:

Utah has its own color coding for air quality conditions: 0 – 24 micrograms/cubic meter concentration of PM2.5 is considered Green, 25 – 34 ug/m3 is Yellow, and 35+ ug/m3 is Red. As you may guess, the cutoffs are somewhat arbitrary and subject to change the more studies reveal about the hazards of breathing air pollution, the lower those cutoffs will get shifted.


Some behavior is discouraged based on the color code of the day. It is "suggested" that children, the elderly, and those with respiratory disorders basically not go outside on Red days (I'm not kidding).

Also, here on the Wasatch front we still have a fair number of homes that use wood-burning stoves. Wood burning is regulated by air quality. From the Division of Environmental Quality:

A “red” day means wood burning is prohibited. Residents are also asked to drive as little as possible on “red” days, and industries are asked to minimize their release of air pollutants.

A “yellow” day means a voluntary no-burn or a recommended reduction in wood or coal burning. Residents are also asked to drive as little as possible on “yellow” days, and industries are asked to minimize their release of air pollutants.

A “green” day means wood burning is allowed.


Note that all curtailment of pollution on worse days is voluntary (with the exception of wood burning, which will net you a ticket if the police bother to enforce the regulation, which they usually don't).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apparently, Liberals Are The Illuminati

posted 10/5/2012 by the Salt City Sinner Greetings, sheeple, from my stronghold high atop the Wells Fargo Building in downtown Salt City, where I type this before a massive, glowing bank of monitors that display the ongoing progress of my 23-point plan for complete social control. Whether you want to demonize me as a "liberal," or prefer the Glenn Beck update "progressive," we all know the truth, and it's time to pull the curtain aside: like all left-leaning persons, I am actually a member of the Illuminati. How else to explain how much power my side of the aisle wields in U.S. American politics? According to conservatives, liberals/the Illuminati control the media * , science * , academia in general * , public schools * , public radio * , pretty much anything "public," the courts * , and Hollywood * . Hell, we pretty much control everything except for scrappy, underdog operations like WND and Fox News, or quiet, marginalized voices like

Cult Books: One Good, One Terrible

  I’ve finished writing a new novel (stay tuned for details) in which the massacre at Jonestown in November 1978 plays a pivotal role. Both to research it and because the phenomenon interests me, I’ve read more than a few books on cults and cultic ideology over the last year.

God, Power, Fear, and Donald Trump

Posted on 11/23/2019 by the Salt City Sinner What does it mean to love God, what does it mean to love power, and what does it mean to love Donald Trump? Are these separate questions, or have they become scrambled together? Given that 81% of Evangelicals voted for Trump , it’s safe to conclude that the latter is the case. Unpacking the tangled webbing of fear, greed, superstition, and credulity that binds white Evangelicals to Donald J. Trump, the most profane and libertine President in United States history, will be the project of generations. Religious conservatives didn’t get here overnight, and it’s an odd place for them to have arrived at, but the journey isn’t as mysterious as it might seem at first glance. A good place to start is Believe Me: the Evangelical Road to Donald Trump , by John Fea . Fea’s book is an attempt to answer these questions in a serious way, and from the standpoint of one who shares many of the values and presuppositions of the average parish