Skip to main content

Crib Notes and TelePrompTers

Okay - the furor over Sarah Palin's use of crudely scribbled notes on her palm:



...would be silly if she hadn't followed the right-wing script of leaping down Obama's throat for his use of a TelePrompTer every time she was given the shadow of an opportunity. I think Joan Walsh pretty much hit the nail on the head when it comes to summarizing the tone of Palin's Tea Party speech (and, frankly, her whole Nuremberg Junior approach to politics in general):

I know journalists aren't supposed to use words like mean and dumb, but I can't help it. Palin is one of the meanest people on the public stage today. She wallows in it. She loves it! Also? Possibly one of the dumbest. But mean works, and so does dumb. And so do lies, and there were many mean, dumb lies in her speech.


Dave Weigel* also noted Palin's tone:

“How’s that hopey-changey thing working out for ya?” said Palin, paraphrasing a slogan made popular on Tea Party t-shirts.” She mocked the stimulus package — the speech was heavy on mockery — by leaning slightly down and saying “nobody messes with Joe,” quoting a comment President Obama made that has been more or less forgotten outside of Tea Party circles.


Leaving aside the standard use of TelePrompTers by every living human who speaks in the media, I was personally pissed off by both Palin (and the right in general) making this an issue, and then Palin's change of heart on crib notes for personal reasons.

Not to toot my own horn, but I was Utah State Champion in National Extemporaneous Speech/Debate in both 1998 and 1999 (I was also a double ruby member of the National Forensics League). For all of you non-nerds out there, this is what my event was: I was given a topic, and had 30 minutes to write and memorize a persuasive seven minute argument on the subject. None of us were allowed TelePrompTers, true, but none of us were allowed to jot down notes on our palms, either (that, to me, seems like the domain of grade school kids trying to cheat an exam).

President Obama is a professor of Constitutional law. He faced down a hostile GOP assembly with no notes and no prompts. Sarah Palin is a failed Governer of a weird, backwater state, and can't even answer softball questions from the most friendly audience imaginable without resorting to crib notes scribbled on her palm.

Sarah Palin is the type of worthless political hack who never could have cut it in Extemp, let alone mainstream politics, and yet here we have a whole movement (albeit a small and silly one) ready to embrace her.

* - Dave Weigel's coverage of the convention is invaluable, and I encourage anyone interested in this freak show to follow it at the Washington Independent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apparently, Liberals Are The Illuminati

posted 10/5/2012 by the Salt City Sinner Greetings, sheeple, from my stronghold high atop the Wells Fargo Building in downtown Salt City, where I type this before a massive, glowing bank of monitors that display the ongoing progress of my 23-point plan for complete social control. Whether you want to demonize me as a "liberal," or prefer the Glenn Beck update "progressive," we all know the truth, and it's time to pull the curtain aside: like all left-leaning persons, I am actually a member of the Illuminati. How else to explain how much power my side of the aisle wields in U.S. American politics? According to conservatives, liberals/the Illuminati control the media * , science * , academia in general * , public schools * , public radio * , pretty much anything "public," the courts * , and Hollywood * . Hell, we pretty much control everything except for scrappy, underdog operations like WND and Fox News, or quiet, marginalized voices like

Cult Books: One Good, One Terrible

  I’ve finished writing a new novel (stay tuned for details) in which the massacre at Jonestown in November 1978 plays a pivotal role. Both to research it and because the phenomenon interests me, I’ve read more than a few books on cults and cultic ideology over the last year.

God, Power, Fear, and Donald Trump

Posted on 11/23/2019 by the Salt City Sinner What does it mean to love God, what does it mean to love power, and what does it mean to love Donald Trump? Are these separate questions, or have they become scrambled together? Given that 81% of Evangelicals voted for Trump , it’s safe to conclude that the latter is the case. Unpacking the tangled webbing of fear, greed, superstition, and credulity that binds white Evangelicals to Donald J. Trump, the most profane and libertine President in United States history, will be the project of generations. Religious conservatives didn’t get here overnight, and it’s an odd place for them to have arrived at, but the journey isn’t as mysterious as it might seem at first glance. A good place to start is Believe Me: the Evangelical Road to Donald Trump , by John Fea . Fea’s book is an attempt to answer these questions in a serious way, and from the standpoint of one who shares many of the values and presuppositions of the average parish