Skip to main content

"Patriots for a Moral Utah"

Yesterday, I caught the following off of my Twitter feed:

fruhwirth: BREAKING: Download a proposed ballot initiative that seeks forced relocation--"final solution"--of homosexual Utahns http://bit.ly/awx8Iv


What followed was a day of bizarre accusations and counter-accusations in the Salt Lake LGTB/activist community. To clear things up in advance: the group proposing this “initiative,” Patriots for a Moral Utah, is a Yes-Men-esque send up of, in the words of one of their leaders, “Chris Buttars, Gayle Ruzika, [the] Sutherland Institute and of course the Mormon Church.”

PMU’s modest proposal is as follows: under their “initiative,” gay Utahns would be required by law to either 1.) voluntarily leave the state, 2.) leave the state via public transit free of charge, or 3.) report to a rehabilitation center where their homosexuality will be “cured.” It was an intentionally *way* over the top exercise in button-mashing (they actually used the phrase “final solution” in the draft, for God’s sake).

Now, I’m of two minds on this. One, it literally boggles my mind that as usually astute a journalist/blogger as Jesse Fruwith got suckered by this stuff, and had to spend the rest of the day dealing with it. The second I read his tweet (via a retweet by my sister) I hit the brakes and thought “WAAAAIIT a second…” Of course, given some of the legislation that has passed here recently, it’s extremely hard to tell satire from reality in Utah on the best of days, so I’m more or less giving Fruwith a pass on this one. Once the hoax was uncovered during a “press conference,” Fruwith responded in a post at the City Weekly:

The phony press conference is a play out of the Yes Men play book. For example, The Yes Men once punked the U.S. Chamber of Commerce by announcing a press conference, then posing as representatives of that group while calling for climate change legisation. It was funny, you see, because the Chamber opposes such legislation. Ha. Zinger. Got 'em.

I'm not sure what Ha-Ha we were supposed to get from today's action, but I think the point they must have been trying to make is that it is somewhat believable that Utah could foster such a movement of concerned citizens that would openly and publicly call for Nazi-like solutions to the "homosexual problem?" Ha?


So on the other hand, generally speaking, I’m with Fruwith on this one*. I engaged in a lengthy e-mail exchange with my sister earlier today about this. She expressed regret that the participation of Ashley Anderson and some other activists made it seem like Patriots for a Moral Utah was somehow a project of Peaceful Uprising, which it wasn’t – at least one of the guys behind the antics has stepped forward to take credit/blame. Despite emphasizing that PeaceUp had nothing to do with the PMU thing, Flora said that “[the fake press event] was a neat piece of political theater intended to call into question the ‘mutual hiatus’ of the Equality Utah et al folks vs. the conservative legislature.” I replied that

I'm familiar with the mutual hiatus thing, but I still fail to see why it was a "neat piece of political theater" OR why it calls mutual hiatus into question. Wasn't this the media equivalent of throwing the first punch (one below the belt, at that) and then pretending that your opponent started the fight?


Flora replied (fairly enough) that:

I see your point, but really (I gather) a lot of the Utah LGBT community feels the first punch was thrown when the left agreed to the hiatus…There was a coalition of different groups behind it keeping things on the DL because they didn’t want anyone to know [PMU] was a hoax.


At the end of the day, one thing’s for certain: Patriots for a Moral Utah wins my nomination for “Best Integration of Buddy Christ Into a Logo, 2010:”



* - A caveat here: I think that Fruhwith took this stunt way more personally than he should have. After implying that PeaceUp was somehow connected to this, he did issue a partial retraction. Also, Fruhwith’s initial post – later amended – implied that some if not all of the protestors present at the event weren’t in on the joke. Ashley Anderson claims they were. Fruhwith has confirmed that at least some of them were.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apparently, Liberals Are The Illuminati

posted 10/5/2012 by the Salt City Sinner Greetings, sheeple, from my stronghold high atop the Wells Fargo Building in downtown Salt City, where I type this before a massive, glowing bank of monitors that display the ongoing progress of my 23-point plan for complete social control. Whether you want to demonize me as a "liberal," or prefer the Glenn Beck update "progressive," we all know the truth, and it's time to pull the curtain aside: like all left-leaning persons, I am actually a member of the Illuminati. How else to explain how much power my side of the aisle wields in U.S. American politics? According to conservatives, liberals/the Illuminati control the media * , science * , academia in general * , public schools * , public radio * , pretty much anything "public," the courts * , and Hollywood * . Hell, we pretty much control everything except for scrappy, underdog operations like WND and Fox News, or quiet, marginalized voices like

Cult Books: One Good, One Terrible

  I’ve finished writing a new novel (stay tuned for details) in which the massacre at Jonestown in November 1978 plays a pivotal role. Both to research it and because the phenomenon interests me, I’ve read more than a few books on cults and cultic ideology over the last year.

God, Power, Fear, and Donald Trump

Posted on 11/23/2019 by the Salt City Sinner What does it mean to love God, what does it mean to love power, and what does it mean to love Donald Trump? Are these separate questions, or have they become scrambled together? Given that 81% of Evangelicals voted for Trump , it’s safe to conclude that the latter is the case. Unpacking the tangled webbing of fear, greed, superstition, and credulity that binds white Evangelicals to Donald J. Trump, the most profane and libertine President in United States history, will be the project of generations. Religious conservatives didn’t get here overnight, and it’s an odd place for them to have arrived at, but the journey isn’t as mysterious as it might seem at first glance. A good place to start is Believe Me: the Evangelical Road to Donald Trump , by John Fea . Fea’s book is an attempt to answer these questions in a serious way, and from the standpoint of one who shares many of the values and presuppositions of the average parish