Skip to main content

WND: Racist, Ignorant, Far-Right Lunatics

posted 7/26/2012 by the Salt City Sinner

For somewhere between five and ten years now, I have been fascinated by WND, formerly World Net Daily.

I've posted more than a few entries about Big Joe Farah and his online mental health clinic, and with good reason .WND is the progenitor and primary past and present promoter of the Obama birth certificate conspiracy, promotes the idea of an American Christian theocracy, routinely cranks out hate speech about Arabs, Muslims, gay people, and pretty much anyone else who doesn't fit their target demographic of old, white, ultra-far-right cranks.

Of particular note lately is WND's decision to hire Colin Flaherty as their new Black People Are Scary Correspondent. Flaherty has been cranking out a series of "black mobs attack white people" stories for the last month and a half. WND and Flaherty are also pimping his recent rant, "White Girl Bleed A Lot," which is basically a book-length "black mobs" rant.


As I noted before, Flaherty's perspective on these matters is not what you would call well-informed. His primary source material for his articles is - and this is him saying this, not me - YouTube videos and tweets from random black people.

In a recent post about Flaherty and his little white-guy crusade, I wrote:

How would Big Joe come off if we scraped the bottom of Twitter's barrel and judged him and his "news" organization by what we found?
I meant that as a criticism of Flaherty's sources, which are dubious at best. However, upon reading his post two days ago (  "Black Mobs Now Have Soundtrack For Violence"* ) I realized that  while looking for a representative sample of Flaherty's fans on Twitter might yield horrifying but unfair results, a sample of the comments left on his article by registered (and frequent) readers/commenters on WND might prove illuminating. Let's have a peek, shall we?

[Editor's Note: the following screencaps of comments on WND contain vile, racist hate speech. Obscenity has been carefully edited out, as WND finds nasty language objectionable. It's worth noting that while they edit posts for s-bombs or f-bombs, they do not, apparently, edit for anything else. You have been warned.]

We'll start out with some of the more level-headed and innocuous reactions to Archduke Flaherty's latest column.


"Spoiled and coddled" and "no consequences," yes sirree. That would explain the staggering rate of incarceration among black adults and youth and widespread incidents of police brutality.


jesus christ


It's nice that wi163175/OLD ONE 75 calls the modern Klan evil, but "protect our white women?"


"C'mon, guys, what's the big deal about slavery?!"


You know, the LDS Church here in Salt City has an internationally renowned and well-equipped genealogy facility. Just sayin'.

Now this is where we get into the tall weeds, so to speak:



These are just two examples of the old "back to Africa" chestnut on WND. There are literally pages of this sentiment on every post that features Obama or just black people in general. One particularly offensive example suggested that Obama pack his family up and move everyone back to Africa - but no, the Birther thing and WND's hatred of Obama aren't racially motivated at all, these are just patriots expressing their honest regard for Our Founding Fathers.

Then there are the predictable if depressing death threats...



...and the REALLY nasty stuff.



Nice.

WND is not just bordering on Stormfront territory any more: I think it's pretty clear that one of the U.S.' most popular and widely read right-wing news sites is openly white supremacist at this point.

What does it take, given the above sentiments, to get shut down by moderators? Oh, the word $h!t. We can't have that on our nice, clean Christian website:


To emphasize that again: dropping the s-bomb will get you edited by the moderators at WND, while "ooga booga booga" and other openly racist, Klansman-style, deep southern fried white hate is totally okay (file under Free Expression, I guess).

Since WND is extra-Christy, let's get biblical on them:

Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
            - Matthew 7:16
WND is an extremist, far-right wing, racist organization, and their avid followers are a pack of ignorant bigots.

*: It's worth noting that Flaherty's "breaking news" for this article consists of scary lyrics from rap songs, a few of which are over ten years old and the most recent of which is a year old. STAY TUNED FOR UP TO THE MINUTE COVERAGE, GUYS!!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apparently, Liberals Are The Illuminati

posted 10/5/2012 by the Salt City Sinner Greetings, sheeple, from my stronghold high atop the Wells Fargo Building in downtown Salt City, where I type this before a massive, glowing bank of monitors that display the ongoing progress of my 23-point plan for complete social control. Whether you want to demonize me as a "liberal," or prefer the Glenn Beck update "progressive," we all know the truth, and it's time to pull the curtain aside: like all left-leaning persons, I am actually a member of the Illuminati. How else to explain how much power my side of the aisle wields in U.S. American politics? According to conservatives, liberals/the Illuminati control the media * , science * , academia in general * , public schools * , public radio * , pretty much anything "public," the courts * , and Hollywood * . Hell, we pretty much control everything except for scrappy, underdog operations like WND and Fox News, or quiet, marginalized voices like

Cult Books: One Good, One Terrible

  I’ve finished writing a new novel (stay tuned for details) in which the massacre at Jonestown in November 1978 plays a pivotal role. Both to research it and because the phenomenon interests me, I’ve read more than a few books on cults and cultic ideology over the last year.

God, Power, Fear, and Donald Trump

Posted on 11/23/2019 by the Salt City Sinner What does it mean to love God, what does it mean to love power, and what does it mean to love Donald Trump? Are these separate questions, or have they become scrambled together? Given that 81% of Evangelicals voted for Trump , it’s safe to conclude that the latter is the case. Unpacking the tangled webbing of fear, greed, superstition, and credulity that binds white Evangelicals to Donald J. Trump, the most profane and libertine President in United States history, will be the project of generations. Religious conservatives didn’t get here overnight, and it’s an odd place for them to have arrived at, but the journey isn’t as mysterious as it might seem at first glance. A good place to start is Believe Me: the Evangelical Road to Donald Trump , by John Fea . Fea’s book is an attempt to answer these questions in a serious way, and from the standpoint of one who shares many of the values and presuppositions of the average parish